Woodland Meadow, 1876
Is this a woman or a man, picking flowers in a field?
What would an artist be inspired to paint a picture of a woman in the mannish clothing they wear today?
Painting by Basile Lemeunier, French, 1852-1922
Describe the women's clothing in this painting, and contrast it to the men's clothing in the same painting. Would we be able to distinguish the men from the women so easily on a street today?
Victorian Street Scene, circa 1859
Try clicking on the picture to get a larger view.
What is the difference between the men and women in this 19th century street photograph? Are the men or women wearing hats in this scene?
On the Riviera
by Sir John Lavery, Irish, 1856-1941
What is the main difference between the woman's clothing and the man's clothing in this painting?
Mariposa Family in Arizona, late 1800's or early 1900's.
Even in this native American photograph, the women are dressed very differently from the man.
Does this look like a rich family, or a poor one? In poverty, the women were STILL dressed better than women today, and it looks like, even in the desert lands, they had more sense about clothing.
Manhattan Family, 1899
In this art work, why is the man's clothing such a contrast to the women's? Do the women look feminine or masculine? Is the man dressed like a woman or a man? What is the difference in their hair styles? What are the figures in the sketch admiring?
1800's University Singers of New Orleans
Can you tell the men and women apart in this Victorian-era photograph?
Employees at a publishing house in Tennessee in the late 1800's.
Where are the men, in this photograph? What is one way of identifying the men in this picture?
Beach Scene in 1899
Do you think it is hard to tell the difference between the men and the women in this painting?
A Liberian Family in 1906
This family was probably not rich, but look how well they are dressed. We grew up poor also, but our clothing still looked nice. Clothing has little to do with poverty or wealth: the standards are based upon your personal beliefs and values.
While the past is often stereotyped as being ignorant and unprogressive, even the poorest of women had pretty, well-fitting clothing, and the men looked different than the women. Can you point out major differences in clothing of the male and female, in this old photograph.
There are several ways to emphasise the differences between male and female. These may include things like: voice inflection, gestures and manners, the walk or gait, the expressions, the way one speaks to or treats the opposite sex, or choices of life activities. All of these take some time to develop, and will be eventually addressed here on this blog, but for now, I will discuss one way to emphasise femininity that is the most easy to change: the manner of dress.
The first photograph is from a clipping collection from magazines. I thought the picture presented a truth in light of all the rumours concerning the Victorians: moderns sometimes insist that women were oppressed by the patriarchy and not allowed outside the home without an escort, and forced to wear hats or be disgraced. In this picture we see that most of the women are bare-headed, although carrying umbrellas for shade. If you look carefully, you can see several women apparently going about their business in the stores, without male accompaniment.
The photographs of the publishing house staff debunks another feminist myth: that women were not allowed to earn money. Obviously, the photographs and company records tell the truth that women had plenty of an opportunity to earn money. Most, however, sought to marry and get out of that workforce so they could tend to their homes. It took the 20th century to convince women they were not necessary at home.(See the sermon by Peter Marshall under Theme Articles on the sidebar).
I thought the 1800's University photograph dispelled the myth that women could not attend college in the Victorian era. Too many photographs and recorded data shows that this simply was not true. However, I posted these photographs for a study of feminine clothing. The women's clothing was in stark contrast to the mens in shape and in style. Today, the contrast is less, and that is why you sometimes cannot tell the difference between a man and a woman from a distance, or when you walk behind them.
While watching the film "The Electric Edwardians" from Netflix, I observed several interesting things. Firstly, the men and women, even the unmarried ones, mingled freely, and with out any apparent hesitation. The social restrictions of the times may have actually made them more trusting and more comfortable in each others presence. Several clips in this film showed fathers holding the hands of their little girls, while walking around London parks on Sunday afternoons.
Secondly, the women, rich and poor alike, were fully covered, with long skirts and full-style blouses. The only immodesty in the film was the footage of the circus performers. They seemed to accept it in circuses but apparently did not imitate that mode of dress in public or at home. Today, we see a singer or a "star" with strange clothing that looks like torn underwear, performing on stage, , and the next thing you know, people are wearing the same style in public. The Victorians had a better sense of propriety than we do: some clothing was perfectly acceptable for circus performers, but it was not acceptable for ordinary wear. Do you think the people in the street scene would be grieved if they could see the way their descendents dress today? What do you think they would be most sorrowful about?
To be more feminine, the main thing to remember is to be completely opposite in appearance from men. Men, real men, don't wear dresses. Women can distinguish themselves by wearing women's clothing: dresses, skirts, and soft, feminine clothing in colours that men do not generally wear. Observe also the prints and colors of men's clothing, and strive to find the opposite. Look at the shape of men's collars and pockets, cuffs and sleeves, shoes, etc. and wear yours more rounded or puffed or gathered; anything opposite or different than menswear.
In the painting by Sir John Lavery, the woman's dress looks softer and thinner than the man's suit. While some people claim that the 18th and 19th century paintings presented and "idealized" version of the era, the photographs, which show the same styles, are of real people. I posted some of the autochromes, in a previous article, showing the similarities of the photographs to the paintings. Film footage of the time was certainly not "staged" in any way, showing normal people milling around on streets in towns. The women looked MUCH different than the men. I do not believe it was "idealized." I believe it was real. Just check out the photographs in your own family history.
Men generally wear solid colors in heavier fabrics. Women have an opportunity to be more feminine in their appearance by using prints with flowers, bright colors and pastels, and soft fabrics, liberally, and wear clothing that is shaped differently than men's. Camp shirts, golf shirts, t-shirts, cargo pants, jeans and sweatpants, racing suits and track pants are not feminine in appearance. Leave them to the men, and give them something to distinguish themselves with. Stop taking over their territory: their clothing, their jobs, their roles in life, have all been homogenized by the designers, the programmers and the planners, that think they know how this world should be organized. You can change the culture, just by changing the way you dress.
The cultures of the world that have kept their history and still wear their national dress bear testimony to us: that the women did not wear clothing that looked like men's clothing. some of these countries still maintain a semblence of this respect for the differences between men and women. It is our enlightened western civilization that has blurred the differences in appearance between male and female. However, you can still find photographs of the past and see the civilization that kept to the distinguishing of male and female appearance, manners and family values; a civilization that once was. No matter how cold, or how hot it was, how hard the work or how vigorous the activity, women still dressed femininely. Ask yourself why this was so important to them.
There is a chapter in the book, "The Benevolence of Manners" which shows the historical reasons that women dressed the way they did in the past. While this book has its flaws, it helps you understand some things about the clothing of the women. They dressed the way they did because they did not want to offend anyone. Though not everyone was a Christian, most people were familiar with the Bible and with the principles of modesty.
The society in general did not think it was right to show too much of their flesh in public. They believed that if you gave someone an inch, they would take a mile, becoming more permissive. They believed in personal restraint and privacy. We live in a let-it-all-hang-out era that is most depressing. However, that can all change with just one of you.
Great changes have been made without a group backing it up. Look at the homeschool movement of the 1980's that began with a few concerned mothers. They had no talk-show personalities to boost their confidence, no fancy curriculums to lean on, and certainly no church families to support their efforts. They did it because they knew it was the right thing to do, and that it would be wrong to neglect their children. Covering your body more femininely and beautifully does not have to have group-approval. You just need you and God, and that is a majority. Everyone knows that. There is a scripture in the book of James that says, "Therefore, to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth it not, to him, it is sin." This is certainly a verse to ponder, when trying to make a righteous decision.
It can be a little daunting if you feel you are the only one doing it, but what you do when you wear womens clothes in public instead of what one writer called "The communist uniform for women (jeans)" is give others the courage to dress femininely also. In doing so, you are letting your light shine and you are making your country beautiful. When someone sees you dressed like a female instead of a male, she secretly wishes she could dress that way, and somehow it makes her think on it more and one day she might decide to quit dressing like a man, too. It is not a matter of wealth or of poverty. It takes some sense and the development of your eyes to be on the lookout for good clothing that is modest and beautiful and feminine; different from men.
This series about clothing and sewing and painting-inspired dressing is coming to a close at the end of December, but there will be plenty of other topics coming up after that.