Saturday, January 01, 2005

For Newcomers - Just a Reminder

Swedish Woman Writing With a Quill Pen
by A. Jernberg (1826-1894)




If you are not a homemaker and have no children or have not married, I would like you to know that just because I am married, am a mother and grandmother and am a full time homemaker, it does not mean that I do not approve of you because you are not.

If you have never had children, it does not mean that because I've had children that I do not like you. If you have not married it does not mean that because I am married I do not approve of or like anyone who is not.

If you like dogs in the house it does not mean that because I do not like a dog inside the house that I do not like you or your dog. If you do not enjoy glitter, it does not mean that I look down on you because I like glitter and glitz. If you don't like to wear dresses, it does not automatically mean that I dislike anyone because I like skirts and dresses and they do not.

If you like to shave your head and put posts in your skin, it does not automatically follow that I do not like you because I do not have posts or metal in my skin. Because I have not shaved my head does not mean I have condemned you for shaving yours. Because I cook some meals does not mean that I don't approve of you because you do not cook.

I hope by these ridiculous comparisons you can see my point. If you got on a blog where some woman was making cloth dolls, would you flame her and say that she was condemning everyone that did not make and sell dolls? Would you say she was putting you down because she did not give an alternative to making dolls? You would expect a doll making site to be about making dolls, wouldn't you? Would you complain that she didn't fairly offer alternatives to doll making, or allow other opinions? Would you flame someone who wanted to make her own bread instead of buying it, just because you do not make your own bread?

These are just a few points I'd like to bring out, especially for the very young, single women who have never had children, never run a home, and have not had the experience of a long marriage. This blog provides ideas to make being a wife, mother and homemaker the best it can possibly be. It does not have alternatives. I do not promise to give fair treatment to those who do not wish to be home, who are not wanting to marry, do not want to honor their husbands, and who do not want to keep house. It addresses those who really want to do it.

Take a break from this article and go here http://coffeecatholic.blogspot.com/2008/05/manipulating-others-using-hurt-feelings.html to see how one woman in the UK is handling the argumentive naysayers on her blog. They have the same "you are offending me" attitudes that the flamers on my blog have, and I think her post has exposed them. Also, look at the articles on her blog, here http://coffeecatholic.blogspot.com/.

A new way of thinking amongst many people is that if someone is doing very well, they are doing it at the expense of someone else. If someone is doing something successfully or has developed a nice skill, they are somehow condemning and judging everyone else. If someone has a successful marriage and family life they are being hateful toward those who does not. This is the kind of attitude that Marxists (see the Marxism/Feminism connection on Rob Fedder's blog "No Ma'am, and Vox Day's blog) depend on in order to create strife so that people will riot when they blow their bugle.

The "its not fair" mentality seems to be the pervading theme in the minds of many students, who are people you would think of as being open to new ideas and eager learners of truth outside of the things dictated to them through textbooks. Unfortunately, from my mail, it is apparent that many students think everyone that is doing something they are not doing is somehow putting them down. I do not know where this mentality comes from, unless it is a result of extreme isolation from the real world of marriage, home and family.

Some of the critics of this blog have a hatred for the past, particularly the Victorian era. One book they need to read to clear their minds is "Simple Social Graces" by Linda Lichter. I have explained how this book can clear up some of the myths about that era (i.e. that because most women preferred to be wives, mothers and homemakers, that they were not fulfilled, or that they were unhappy, repressed, downtrodden, poor, hated, beaten and starved, etc.)

This book shows how the 1920's generation rebelled against their authorities and brought down the niceties of the civilized era that they lived in. It shows how rumors were created about the past to prevent people from going back to the good ways, and to usher in the new ways. Many of these myths keep young women from following their natural desires to be wives, mothers and homemakers. This book needs to be added to their personal curriculum of voluntary learning.

I have said all that to counter-act the amount of frivolous mail I get saying that I am prejudiced against women who work, women who send their children outside the home for education, and women who do not do their own housework. If you are working outside the home, does that mean you hate all homemakers? If you are sending your children to government schools, does that mean you hate homeschool families? If you do not attend worship services does that mean you hate those who do? I doubt it!

Now and then there is a totally silly comment that people here are acting like they are above everyone else. I assure you that homemakers are a very private group that do not have time to meddle in other people's lives and do not have time to organize other people's homes. Mostly, their blogs are sharing what can be done at home that lift up the family and give a positive view of home keeping.

I read in the news in the UK about a woman who merely had a blog about baking and knitting. Immature women flamed her constantly, posting rude comments on her blog, even though all she was doing was making her life better at home. She later wrote a book and was trashed continually in the news. This comes from envy, and I've said before, envy is immature.

If you cannot see what advantages you have in life, and indeed, blessings you have that others do not, you will never be happy. I watch some of the students blogs, particularly girls. They spend their spare time trashing other people and satirizing homemakers articles about cooking, cleaning, decorating and sewing. After some observation over a couple of years time, I noticed that about every five posts comes one where the blogger will tell how low they feel; how depressed they are; how they hope they do not end up in a mental facility. All this negative attitude eventually adds up to depression. Many of them deny the existence of God and mock the name of Christ all week. They sometimes become very, very ill later on.

You cannot put envious, mocking thoughts in your head constantly and hope to have a happy outlook on life. If young students spend the week days vilifying whatever is good and pure and lovely, it is no wonder that the thoughts will eventually pressurize their heads so much that they will be driven to drink all week end. I wrote several articles which have not been labeled yet, about how we have to be as careful what we say and think as we do putting pure food into our bodies. If a person feeds his body junk food all week, it will not be surprising that he feel sick on the week end. After a week of crude remarks and rude come-backs, these girls will naturally be so sick of life they will sink into depression, which always follows.

If girls engage in jealous mockery, and put their nose in the air in a superior attitude towards the natural, God-given roles of women, all week, they should know that it will come back on their heads by the end of the week. They will feel down. They will not feel life has worth. They will feel though they are put down by others, but it is they who put themselves down, and they alone.

There are always those who believe they know what is best for women. We have seen it in all generations, from Margaret Sanger and Margaret Meade, to Betty Friedan and Gloria Steinem, women who wrote books that pretended to elevate women, erstwhile, bringing them down from the glory of the home where they could truly be the queen of their castles and shine out to the world.

The only reliable, never changing principles for women to follow are found in the Bible. They begin in the Garden of Eden where Eve was given the job of being a help meet to her husband. Throughout the Old Testament we see women who desired to have husbands and children so much that they cried out to God. It was the most important thing to them. They could have been out in the field driving cattle or fixing wagon wheels, and perhaps some of them did, but that does not mean that they did not find the office of home-keeper the highest a woman could achieve.

In the New Testament, the book of First Timothy 5:15 shows that women should marry, bear children and keep house, so that the adversary could not find fault. Throughout the Bible we see that God had ordered the man, beginning from Adam, to toil to provide bread for his family. The New Testament specifically states: 1Ti 5:8 But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel. The words "his" and "he" indicate that it is the man of the house that is to be the provider. That does not mean that women can never earn money or provide, but that it is the job specifically given to the man.

When we send our children to others to be educated day in and day out, role reversals should be no surprise. They have special classes to help the children understand that there are no differences between the roles of men and women, and that the home is an archaic, outdated institution that must be replaced by the state. I will post quotes from socialists/communists/Marxists that prove this agenda on their part. Their last stronghold is the home and the church and if they can institutionalize everyone and put every bit of knowledge and every relationship in an institution fostered by the state, they will have achieved their goal.

What this blog is all about is to say you do not have to wait until all your friends have jumped on the bandwagon and gone home to raise their families. You do not have to wait until some government statistic says families can now live on the husband's income. You do not have to wait to do what is right and what is best for your children. You do not have to wait until homeschooling is popular and approved. You can take hold of the Bible now and do what God says do and go back to the old paths, where the good walk is, and where you will find peace. Following what the government media and the society says and does will bring constant upheaval, as they change their rules so often. One week the world is going to starve, and another week there are not enough children being born. Another week, according to the media, the children are not skilled enough in math, and another week they are all in danger of getting the bird flu. If you follow the status-quo you will get only misery and turmoil. The only thing that brings stability is the word of God, which truly liberates women to be home guiding the house with all her creativity and intelligence. Christ freed her long before women's lib enslaved her.

If you come here and you think you are being condemned, think again. If you decided to be a homemaker, you would find yourself being accused of being an elitist, conceited upper classed woman with no brains. Yet I doubt any successful home can be run by a stupid woman who smokes and drinks and parties all the time. Take a good look at yourself and ask how you are preparing for the future of having children? All the drugs and drinking and late nights will effect your ability to have children. Also, those who do have children may have problems emotionally bonding with them, if they have had substances in their youth. It takes a long, long time to get it out of your system.

Home life will be difficult to understand and adjust to if you as a young girl are used to living to please yourself. If you drink when you want to drink, partner with anyone you want anytime you want, and take pills when you feel down, you will not be able to face the challenges of the home. Taking care of a husband or children takes a great deal of sacrifice. It means putting away your own selfish desires and doing what is best for others in your care. It means, in a sense, being the hero of the home. It means helping others in their destiny in life.

The student life does not adequately prepare women for marriage and family. It does not tell them how to prevent divorce and how to teach their own children. It does not teach them how to stay out of debt and built personal wealth within their own family. It does not tell them how to stay mentally balanced. The lifestyle that students are compelled to live and the living conditions are totally opposite to family life.

I would like to share something about the boys some of you young students are hanging around. You have a great power to influence these young men, if you would recognize and use that power. Instead of sinking to their level of crudeness, rise above it and inspire them to do so. In general, young men who drink and carouse around and party and go from girl to girl will not be good husbands and fathers and providers. If they are not responsible now, they will not be responsible later. Don't expect to meet a guy at a drug or drinking party and take him home and live happily ever after. You cannot make a purse out of a sow's ear. You cannot build a house out of rotten wood.

Many of the young men you look down your nose at because they are laborers or construction works, are more stable and more protective than the weak-willy-nilly men who do not want to exert themselves and make a home for you. If a man does not want to marry you and buy you a washer and a dryer and provide for you, do not flirt with him, date him, or live with him. If you meet a party guy, do not complain that he is irresponsible when you marry him. If you are a student, you should use some of that intellectual ability to discern between good guys and bad guys and save yourself a lot of grief.

A good man will not want to marry a party girl who does not have a purpose in life, so you will have to clean up your own act, as well. It might be fun to be carefree now, but one day you will desire a stable home and family. He that sows to the wind will reap the whirlwind.

This blog shares many people's experience of returning to the old paths, where the good walk is (Jeremiah 6:16) and their successes in the home. That is what it is for. It is not for the purpose of arguing. It is not for the purpose of condemning you if you are not doing this. But, if you want to do it, it is here with a lot of information, some of which might be something you are looking for.

The world needs more homemakers. Expensive homes are empty all day. The world needs more hospitality. In spite of women working outside the home, they suffer more loneliness and more doubts about their validity in their roles. The world needs more mothers at home. There are too many children with their faces pressed against the windows of the day cares they are left in, crying for their mothers to come and get them.

The world needs more older women teaching younger women how to love their husbands. In spite of the amount of dating and pairing up going on, there are too many divorces. Divorce used to be only in very extreme and rare cases. Now couples do not want to endure the difficulties, most of which could be overcome and make them stronger because of it. The world needs more women following the Biblical plan for women to be wives, mothers, homemakers. Titus 2 explains the role of older women and the task of younger women, perfectly.

The world does not need more women in the military, it needs more women at home. The world does not need more women in Universities. They have equalized the men now, so what else is there to prove? The world needs these young women helping young men to be good fathers and husbands, by being good homemakers and being serious about life. One of the best books I read when I was a girl was "Fascinating Womanhood" by Helen Andelin. The women's liberation had run roughshod over women, leading them to believe there was something better than marriage, home and family. Helen did her best to refute that, and although today young girls mock and sneer at the principles that she taught, (good character, house keeping, feminine appearance and attitudes, role distinctions, etc) the teachings have survived. This not because she invented them, but because she used the time-worn teachings that were handed down to us from the scriptures and from generations of women before us. Another book that was prominent at that time was called "She Hath Done What She Could," by Jane McWhorter. In this book she outlined all the responsibilities of women: care of children, care of husband, church responsibilities, helping the poor, teaching the lost, and much more. Lottie Beth Hobbs wrote, "Daughters of Eve," in which she described the attributes of the women mentioned in the Bible, and how they did God's will in the world. Some of these books are available still. Today there are a host of books available to help young women understand the importance of guiding and guarding their own homes: The Spirit of Loveliness by Emilie Barnes Creating a Sensational Home by Terri Willits Home Comforts by Cheryl Mendollsen Treasury of Homekeeping Skills Hopechest Legacy, and many more, too numerous to mention here.

If you are a young women who is not yet an experienced wife, mother and homemaker, it is important to educate yourself in these things before you can understand what we are talking about. I would not think of getting on your blogs and condemning you or accusing you of something. Occasionally I post an article on the dangers of feminism, but for the most part I like to show the joy of homemaking. I hope you will be blessed by it and not feel that anyone is putting you down. That is not my purpose at all. Most people become upset when they read something that they have a problem with. The things that we react to the most are usually the failings that we have.

I hope this explanation has been enlightening, and you will gain further understanding about my rules for posting. Though flexible, I follow the main principle that they should be for the purpose of uplifting the homemaker and reinforcing the homeschooler and the daughter at home. They should be helpful and not calculated to insult those who want to be home and do the right thing. They should not in any way demean the homemaker or the wife and mother, or the Biblical purpose for home.

Sometimes a post will not be published because it leads to a blog that will be a bad influence on someone, or because the blog endorses things that are not holy. Sometimes a post will not be published even if there is nothing wrong with it, because it will invite objections and quarrels, which take up too much time to delete or post. If you can post in such a way as to not come across as attacking or creating any kind of strife, you are more likely to be published. You always have the option of emailing me. You should know when you come here that you are entering a biased area. Everyone is biased about one thing or another. We have no trouble being biased when it comes to the food we like or dislike, or the colors we like to wear or decorate with it. We have no problem with being biased about the people we prefer to be with and those we do not. So, it cannot be that hard to understand that this blog is biased in favor of homemaking, wives, mothers, daughters, families and churches of Christ. This blog will be biased because I am pro-homemaker and pro-home education and pro-private enterprise and pro-family business and pro-men as providers and protectors. When you enter here, at least you should expect me to be biased.

This blog is being posted from the private and beautiful sanctuary of my home, where we are trying to bless one another with encouraging words and good works. Sometimes there are children standing over my shoulder when I read your comments. Therefore, when you, as a young person enter my home, you have to be on your best behavior. You cannot come here and say whatever you like without regard to the impression you will make in my home. If you do not behave yourself, you will not be allowed back, any more than I would invite a rude guest back to my house after they had eaten my well prepared, free dinner all the while hurtling insults at me and my family.

I would not dream of going to your house and deliberately trashing it and then demand to be accepted again. In this world, we are accustomed to being free to do what we want without restraint, but one day you will find that it is nothing but a fantasy world. The real world, that is, our homes and our families and our home education, our decorating, our cooking, our house keeping, our sewing, etc., is controlled by restraint. Taking captive every thought and not letting every single feeling depress others, is part of the way we conduct our home life.

The blog is not for teenagers and students who just want to express themselves. We have no "rights" in the real world of free speech. Freedom is not the right to do and say as we feel all the time, but the responsibility to do our duty. You may comment if the comments will not stir up trouble, and you must learn to be careful not to create comments that will cause arguments. It will be a great exercise in human relations and a good lesson in communication. Finally, no blogger is obligated to allow posts at all, and no one has a "right" to post or a right of free speech unless it is refined. Many girls who are used to having blogs of their own will come aboard and expect to post in the same manner in which they are accustomed. They want to post smart mouthed replies, innuendos and contradictions disguised in clever speech. That doesn't work here. If you want your post published, you cannot write anything that mocks or derides the beauty of the home and the family. Your comment has to be clear. You have to write in a classical way that will not shut out other generations.

You have to write in a way that is not condemning. You cannot start out calling me a hypocrite. You have to have a foundation, even a historical one, for your points, and you cannot just come here and jump around, madly shrieking and casting dust into the air, crying about your your rights. If you want to be read, you have to write legibly and use a little punctuation. I'm not claiming to be the best at grammar or spelling or punctuation, but I do not type with one hand unless I am holding a baby in the other. If I get 12 letters full of this feminist nonsense that has no shred of intelligence, I will condense them into one comment for time and space sake.

A lot of times you girls are just spouting off things you have been indoctrinated with all of your life through friends and media and institutions around you. You have to look at real life sometimes and see how it is working. A lot of people are book smart but not people smart. They have never spent time at home raising children, teaching them, relating to a husband, making a marriage successful, keeping out of debt, and yet they want to tell homemakers, working within the freedom of their own homes and families, that they are brainless. I assure you that brainless people do not teach their own children at home, nor help their husbands be successful in their own businesses, or are alert to needs and emergencies without having to listen to a bell. There is a greater force in homemaking because it is motivated by love, not by social pressure or education. There is more knowledge in homemaking not because it was studied, but because it was practiced.

Take a little time and think about what you are writing. In years to come when you have had some experience in the real world, you may change your mind about a lot of things. Do you want to look back with shame on words you posted that you cannot take back? .Imagine that you get only so many words in a lifetime and that they are like dollar bills. You don't want to waste any on useless language that doesn't really count. Let your words be numbered and do not speak unless they really matter.

Added: Here is the procedure that I follow regarding quarrelsome posts: If you post a question and someone here sincerely tries to answer it, I leave the post up. I will observe if you pick quarrels and seem to be looking for trouble. I may allow a couple of your posts to stick. However, once I figure out what you are up to, I will not only delete the recent post, I will go back to the very first time you ever posted, even if it was 3 years ago, and delete every single post you ever sent. This will make you understand how you can lose even your past prestige and privilege, and how I can remove your influence from way back. You may find whole threads of comments disappearing if you turn them into arguments. In the church, this is like first and second admonition. It is also casting out the scoffer, as Proverbs teaches. President Andrew Jackson told those who troubled our land that he would, by the hand of Almighty God, "route you out." On this blog, if you pretend to be amiable but later on your posts become devisive, you will be thoroughly routed out. Even your good comments will go bye-bye.

Wednesday, December 29, 2004

Dealing with Clutter

Due to some rapid changes in our home life, (illness and subsequent deaths of parents, marriage of daughter and subsequent additions of children, children growing up and moving away, etc) I've let a lot of things slide. Consequently, I noticed myself declining invitations or putting off showing hospitality. Having too much housework and too much clutter, or just too much to look after, decreases the time available to really serve others.

My advice is to keep on top of the clutter as much as you can, from the beginning. When children outgrow something, send it somewhere or box it up properly and store it safely for the future. Don't let closets and drawers and storage areas collect things you can't use. Each time you enter a room, for whatever reason, keep a sharp eye out for clutter than can cause a problem later on. Pick it up, don't pass it up, is the best policy here.

One thing that really helps is to develop habits of decluttering and be aware of what you are doing. If you use a package of something, toss out the bag immediately. Throw away the teabag if you aren't going to use it again. Have a little trash can right near your feet that you can use in the kitchen, or hang a trash bag on the handle of the lower cabinet near the area you are working. Don't let the cabinet tops collect clutter. If you crack and egg, throw the shell away at once. Wipe and clean as you go. In any room, never lay anything down temporarily. Always put it away.

Special cleaning days and spring cleaning can make people miserable. You might feel more tension and tend to snap at everyone because you are starting to realize how they've helped cause all this work for you. The best way to handle this is to take out about 15 minutes each day to tackle a troublesome area, and just keep at it until a room or area or zone is finished. Do all your daily work no matter how bad the rest of the house is. The meals and laundry must be done and the floors kept clean, but inbetween all this, you can clean up clutter.

For the young homemaker, I would suggest you take special note of the toys and clothing strewn around. If your children tend to just drop something somewhere and ignore it for days, gather it all up and put in a box in the garage for awhile. The less they have, the less you'll have to pick up, and the less anger there will be in the home. Remember the pioneer children who were happy with one special toy. Toys can cause accidents and injury in the home, so supervise their care and storage, and don't let your home become "toy city." Children can still be happy and content with fewer things. It is more pleasant to have toys around if they are classical types of toys like a carved wood rocking horse, a good quality doll and carriage, a doll house, fire engine or truck. Balls ought to be kept out doors and not ever thrown inside the house. Lego and blocks should have plastic containers to keep them in and the lid used to build on, so that they can be gathered up and stored easily.

As for adult clutter, this is often very difficult to deal with. I've always thought of my humble little home as being a "castle" and unfortunately, stuffed it full of castle stuff. In reality, it has only the space of a trailer, and not even a double wide at that, so I've allowed clutter to collect a little more than I should have. I don't have an attic or a garage or any dry storage shed or any area to store things, so the junk must go.

One of the best reasons for clearing out the clutter is so that you can find things. When someone says, "Mom, do you remember that book we used to have...", I want to be able to see it in my mind's eye, and say, "Yes, it is on the far right of the third bookshelf from the top in the hall." If someone says "I thought we had a cookie cutter shaped like a rose," I will be able to say, "Third drawer down, near the back in the blue container." I certainly can't do that now, but it is my goal. The less I have, the more likely I'll be able to recall where it is. If you've ever been tempted just to go to Wal-Mart and buy a set of measuring cups because yours are scattered in messy drawers or been used as children's toys, you know you are disorganized. One reason it is easier to go to the discount store to get something is that it is in order on the shelves in those stores. You usually know exactly which aisle to go and look for it. Should it not also be so, in the home?

Still another reason to cut down on the clutter is so that you'll know what you have, and what you need, in order to stock the pantry. The pantry is whatever cabinet or section of the house you use to store your food. If you don't keep this in order, you'll find yourself doubling up on supplies that you don't need, and spending money that you really need for something else.

Ultimately, you will want to be able to entertain on a moment's notice. You see someone at church on Sunday and you dearly would love to have them over, but you know you aren't organized enough to really put on even a simple meal or make a sandwich.

Having too many things to look after, can be a great handicap, as you may not be able to be as flexible as you'd like to be. If you find yourself not being able to do the sewing and crafts you'd like to do, or writing letters, or other things that give you peace and pleasure, take some time out each day to organize and de-clutter. Don't be afraid to get rid of thngs if they aren't really important. You can't take it all with you when you die, and there is more where that came from.
I'm speaking mainly to those who have no place to store things and find themselves, like me, using plastic containers and stacking them up in hallways and corners. If you've got a big house and good storage areas, by all means, store up as much as you like. If, however, it is getting in your way, and you are having to move stuff around all the time, and are unable to function efficiently in the home, then find ways to store it better or get rid of it.

Saturday, December 18, 2004

The Things Grandma Left For Us

As I mentioned before, my daughter had made a speech about her Grandmother's commitment to building up the Ladies Bible Study class which has been meeting each Thursday for nearly 40 years. During her 60's, 70's and even 80's she was tenatious in her drive to get people to this Bible study, and she used it as a path to convert people. She and her husband, or her son (my husband) would conduct other Bible studies in the evening with the husband and wife or the whole family which she had contacted through this class. She would ask some of the ladies who their grown children were and where she could find them, or ask about their relatives or neighbors. After she had won her own neighbor, she would try someone else's neighbor if she could get the contact somehow. This led to many conversions, and really built up the church.

When my children were younger, we had been talking about things grandparents leave for their grandchildren to remember them by, such as a quilt they made, something they crocheted, a special set of dishes, and so forth, and my daughter said, "Grandma, did you ever sew or quilt anything that you could leave to the grandchildren?" Lucile said, "No, I didn't." I suppose as a preacher's wife, there wasn't much time to indulge in these pasttimes, and her sisters and her husband's relatives were always supplying them with hand made things. She had drawers full of crocheted things from her sisters, and many blankets given by other people. There wasn't much need for her to do needle work, and she preferred to write letters or do Bible study.

Lucile didn't think she was very talented, but she wrote lots of poems (and never kept copies of them) for people to include in their birthday cards, and she had great ideas for teaching children's Bible classes. She would take a piece of paper and list the alphabet, with a scripture beside each one, to memorize. "A" would be "As a man thinketh in his heart, so is he," "B" would be "Be faithful unto death and I will give thee a crown of life," and so forth, along with the scripture reference. She did the same thing with numbers, with each number a significant event or command in the scriptures. She could use geography or colors or families, fathers, mothers, wives, husbands, meals:--just about anything could be used as a list of Bible things to know.

She told my daughter, "No, I don't have anything that I made that I can leave for my grandchildren. except the people I converted."

My daughter included this poem in her speech about Grandma, noting the specific phrase, "Living gems at His feet to lay down," to emphasise the souls she won to Christ through her diligent Bible study with these people:

"Oh what joy it will be
When His face I behold,
Living Gems at his feet to lay down,
That bright stars may be mine
In that city of gold,
Will there be any stars in my crown?"

She believed that every soul she won to Christ would give her a star in her crown in Heaven, because the only thing we can take with us when we die, are the deeds we have done and the souls we have won. The "living gems" in the verse meant the souls she brought to into the kingdom of Christ.

I thought about her statement that she couldn't leave us a quilt of any object that was uniquely touched by her hand, and then as we sang the song, "Will there be any stars in my crown" I looked around and saw all the people present there at the dinner that day, and many of them were converted by her. For years, these women have played a big part of our lives. They provided the buffet for my daughter's wedding. They helped my sons and encouraged them and showed them Christian love in so many ways, I can't tell all of them. They've been there at the Bible study from Genesis to Joel so far this year, and many years before when we were in the New Testament and back in the Old Testament again. These were all Lucile's converts, and they provide the Ladies Bible Class that I am now teaching!

These women take a strong interest in the development of our children's lives, and our own. They feel that we belong to them, and it is all because of Grandma. If it had not been for her efforts, there wouldn't be a Ladies Bible Class and the fellowship of these people. Being out in the country area, it can get a bit lonely sometimes, and I always know that Thursday is coming and they will turn the lights on in the fellowship room, and I'll see from my window the cars in the parking area, and we can see each other, laugh a bit, do our lesson, and share a light lunch together there.

An outsider might not consider that anything is significant is important there, but to a young girl of 14, this class was somewhere she could go and be accepted and forget about the problems of youth, in a serious study of the Bible. My daughter said it is now the source of wonderful memories. I had not realized during the times we both walked over there, how important this was to her.

So there you have it: Grandmother didn't leave us a quilt, or an old trunk or anything of earthly value, but left us the "living gems" that interact in our lives
and benefit us in some way every other day. She actually left us the Ladies Bible Class.

Friday, December 17, 2004

The Mixing Bowl

There are some virtues in hand mixing batters and doughs in the bowl. For one thing, there isn't so much equipment with parts and pieces laying out on your surface to clean up and put back together and put away. The family mixing bowl, whether it is a red pottery bowl or a clear green glass bowl, with the wooden spoon, is all that is needed. Why do I say this? Over the years, with continued use, the appliances will break down. The more a person has (blender, mixer, etc), the more places one must find to stash them, and they must be easy access so they can be used again. You don't have to plug the bowl and spoon in, and you can develop the strength in the arms when you do the mixing yourself. It actually doesn't cut down that much on time, if you care to time it and compare, sometime.

There are a couple of other things to consider when using that beautiful mixing bowl. I don't know about you, but I never just mechanically mix up something just because it must be done. There are a lot of things packed into this activity that you may not know. For one thing, I think of the women before me who may have stood at that counter and mixed up a batch of scones or pancakes. I remember the Pioneer women in the log homes or sod homes their husbands built for them. I'm stirring away, and thinking how valuable that mixing bowl must have been to the next generations. Grown children must have wanted their grandmother's mixing bowl, not just for something to use, but for the sentimental value. In using that bowl, the homemaker must have thought of the times of the life of her grandmother, and remembered some of the special occasions when she mixed up a batch of something. Pictures form in her mind of grandmother in her apron, with a contented smile, mixing up something special for her family. I think across the ages to the earliest people in history--even as far back as the women of the Bible making cakes, such as the woman of Zarepath, who made a little cake for Elijah in I Kings 17. So, it is more than just doing a job. It is a repetition of a custom from long ago. We are creating memories for our family when we use the mixing bowl, and one day someone will ask if they can have your mixing bowl.

In the past, I remember most homemakers having a kitchen window. This was very important to them. They knew they would need something to look out on, such as a garden, the driveway where their husbands came home, the flowers, or some scene. They would stand there stirring something in the mixing bowl, and occasionally glance up to see what was happening outside. Some modern houses lack the kitchen window, and this makes some of these rituals a little tedious, in my opinion. So, if you are planning on getting married and having your own mixing bowl, ask your husband to build you a house with a window in a strategic area of interest to you. You may spend many moments like this and be grateful you've got a special scene to look at.

I recently have seen some beautiful bowls that remind me a lot of my childhood. In those days, women didn't choose colors or themes for their homes. They weren't too fussy about that sort of thing. The bowls didn't have to match, and they didn't all have to be the same color. When we were poor, we thought these kind of mixing bowls were unsophisticated and we looked forward to getting something better one day, but now they are an object of nostalgia. I particularly like the bowls sold at http://www.gooseberrypatch.com/ Just type in "bowls" in the search area, and you'll see what I mean.

Something else that happens when someone is in the kitchen mixing something in one of those bowls, is memorable conversation. It is here that no one is in a hurry. People sit down and visit you while you are preparing something, and some very thoughtful principles are discussed. I'm not one for idle chit-chat. I like what people say to me and what I say to them, to have some meaning. A person can actually lose their voice from too much talk, so it is better to leave someone with some conversation of value. The kitchen is where all of our meaningful verbal exchanges occur.

If you have never experienced this, why not get a colorful mixing bowl such as the ones I've mentioned, a wooden spoon, and try mixing up a batch of something for your family. There is no need to serve them something too sweet or non-nutritious, as there are plenty of savory items you can mix, such as cornbread, muffins or a dense cake packed with good whole grains. Mixing up this food isn't just about the food. It is about taking your time and enjoying the process of holding the bowl in one arm and mixing with the other. It presents, in my mind, a beautiful picture.

When a woman mixes up her own baked goods, the children see the process from start to finish, and know where some of the things they eat come from, barring actually harvesting the raw food in the first place. I think sometimes little children think brownies or pizza comes from the store. I once looked after some children for about 2 weeks and when I told them we were having pizza, they were amazed that I was mixing the dough myself. The oldest child said, "I didn't know you could make pizza yourself. I thought you had to buy it."

I just love seeing my daughter mix up something in the kitchen, while her little boys gather around her, one pulling on her apron, one pulling up a chair so he can get a closer look, and another saying, "I want to mix something too!" It is a slightly different version of my own life, when my three children would awkwardly but eagerly scoot up chairs bigger than themselves, to "help" or watch me mix, and my own husband inching up close so he could get a spoonful or dough. Then there was the contest to see who would lick the bowl when it was empty. Before they discovered it was a coveted thing, my husband always licked the bowl. After they found out how good it was, he had competition.

In all the things we perceive as greatness in the world, this is one of the most cherished experiences for people of all ages. In doing this, the woman with the mixing bowl makes a statement about her life. This is her world, her time, and her freedom. She doesn't have to worry about time sheets and schedules and bosses, keeping her job, competing with someone else for better batter, or anything that takes place on "the outside" as I call it. She's not worried about losing her position if it doesn't turn out well. It is the doing of it that counts. She can think about that bowl, and if she got it at her wedding, the person that gave it to her. She can spend a few minutes quietly stirring and thinking about the people that made it possible for her to be as she is today, contentedly stirring something in the mixing bowl.

A woman who has claimed the freedom to create a cake or pudding from her own special mixing bowl, whether it is her own new one she got for her wedding, or the one passed down from her grandmother, has truly made it to the top, in life. Why this is so special, you may well ask, for isn't a recipe a recipe, and don't pralines taste the same, no matter who makes them? Not exactly! Each woman does things a little differently, and that is what makes her cooking unique. Even if we all followed the exact-same recipe, each one of us would come up with a slightly different cake or muffin, due to the differences in climate, the taste of ingredients from one region to another, the sea level, the atmosphere of the kitchen (temperature-wise, the lighting, the amount of time the dough is stirred, the length of time the dough sits before it is baked, and much more!).

I've often had meals at someone else's house that I know I can prepare at my own home, but I always declare to my hostess that hers taste better. Sometimes we share recipes but I can never get mine to taste the same as when eating it at her house. So for many different reasons, the lady with the bowl is both charming and unique, for her batch will have its own taste. She's doing something for which there is no substitute. Just compare the stuff mixed in the big blue ceramic bowl, to something you got at the grocery store, and you'll see what I mean.

That mixing bowl isn't just a utilitarian article in your kitchen, beckoning you to work. It is a ritual, a memory, an experience, an example, a history lesson, and a connection to our forebearers. It is, in my opinion the most glamorous thing a woman can do. She is leaving a type of moving picture in the minds of her children and other family members, which will not seem so important right now, but later, when the grown children bring up their memories, she'll be glad she took the time to do it.

It isn't just the act itself that is so comforting and reassurring to a home, but the end results. The enticing aroma and the final partaking of such a treat, holds a special feeling of anticipation for all members of a family, and their visitors, no matter what age. The mixing bowl transcends the so-called "generation gap" and even moreso the gap we often feel in time. In doing something that the Pilgrims, Pioneers, and Victorians did, these people that once walked the earth and have now "gone home" do not seem so foreign or so strange to us. Like you, there was once a woman in 1890 standing at her sink, glancing up at her family, with the mixing bowl in her arm. Somehow, their lives don't seem so distant from our own, when we are doing something so similar to something they did in their own generation.

Thursday, December 16, 2004

Possibility Thinkers

Recently a dear friend of my husband passed away. The first thing we both remembered about him was his happy, optimistic attitude toward everything. There were no "problems" to him; only possibilities. Things that others thought were obstacles, he thought were opportunities. When he was present, it was like the sun was shining. He was full of life and always making people laugh. The last time I saw him, he was making up a game at our anniversary party, with my first grandchild, and making him laugh. I thought I would like to preserve that child's laughter, as it was so contagious. Now that this man, and others like him of that age (he was 77) are passing on, I wonder if the next generation is willing to pass the torch of the great optimism and possibility thinking of some of those people. It does seem to me that younger people tend to look on the gloomy side of life. There doesn't seem to be many people like "the old folks" used to be. When they got together for church or family events, even in their 70's and 80's they were always laughing and kidding each other. They always seemed thrilled to see others, and treated them like they were celebreties. This man was a one-of-a kind person. He wasn't made from a mold, and you couldn't pinpoint his personality into a category. He wasn't typically anything, except typically himself.He was happy being who he was, and totally unselfconscious about it.

Today my daughter made a speech about her grandmother, to a gathering of ladies at a Bible class luncheon. This Bible class has been meeting for almost 40 years. Some have gone home, and new ones have come along. Like this man, her grandmother saw a possibility in everything, even a trouble. Her greatest goal in life was to bring a large attendance to her Ladies Bible Class, which she taught on Thursdays. She went too often to the fruit and vegetable stand here, just to buy one or two more portions so she could use the opportunity to win the woman over and get her to the weekly class. Her persistance paid off. She never left her neighbor alone. No matter who was renting the house next door, Grandma would eventually get them to the Ladies Bible Class.

When it seems we are faced with some impossible situation, it causes us to think deeply and search creatively within our minds for a solution. If you don't have something, you can substitute or create. I heard a speech once in which a man said, "The only thing holding you back is your own mind." While it is true that there are unchangeables in our lives, such as our race, our place of birth, our parents, etc., and other things for which we have no choice, most of our circumstances can be changed, if we want to change them. This speaker also said something interesting. "Many people want to go on holidays and get away from the things that stress them and bother them. The only problem is, they take their minds with them, and they end up creating the same stresses and difficulties, through negative thinking."

Possibility thinking is easier if you've been brought up around optimistic people. If not, it takes some practice to get rid of the habit of being depressed or looking on the downside of everything. The best way to do this, I've heard, is to substitute a "yes" for a "no." Every time you think you can't possibly achieve something that would make life better for others and yourself, substitute a plan for achieving it, as if there were no barriers. Even if you never manage it, it does your mind a great deal of good to think on the bright side of life. For everything you think of as a problem, you have to substitute a creative alternative, and put it into practice.

From what I've observed, I think it is best to begin with small changes, rather than trying to change things on a grand scale. It is less discouraging to achieve small victories. These can be things like having company more often, getting rid of decades of accumlated clutter, smiling more often, and being an inspiration to the people in your neighborhood, to name only a few.

Tuesday, December 14, 2004

Learning from History

It is sometimes helpful to look to the past where people where successful in marriage, home, and family, in order to see the pattern that people followed. In cases where the Bible was used as a guide for the establishment of the family, there was stability in the marriage, happy children, and prosperity. Any nation can achieve this if families follow the time worn formula found in the scriptures.

Saturday, December 04, 2004

Homemaking - Getting Started

The first thing a lot of experienced homemakers do in the morning, is get up at least 15 minutes or more before everyone else does, in order to make preparation for the day. They usually get their shower and get dressed, fix their hair, and take care of their appearance, to put them in the mood to conduct the home in an orderly way. There is nothing worse than trying to get control of the many facets of homemaking, while still in pyjamas and slippers, unbathed, and hair uncombed. The next thing they do is eat properly so that they will have the fuel and sense of well-being to think straight and get things done. After this, they may do a little something that didn't get done the day before when people were underfoot, such as folding that last load of laundry, or putting away the dishes. The homemaker might also mix up a batch of bread or scones for breakfast.
It helps a lot if you've been brought up watching your mother. I deplore the modern efficiency kitchens, which have no place to sit or eat, where a youngster cannot observe what is going on. The idea of the efficiency kitchen was to save steps, so the homemaker could reach for the fridge door and cook and wash while standing in the same place--very little movement. However we really lost a sense of home and family when we got those tiny little kitchens where families could not work together due to crowdedness. I quite like the open, "keeping room" type of kitchen, where the dining table, as well as the living room, sort of work together. Children can sit at the table and see what their mother is doing, and observe how she cooks. The beauty of this kind of kitchen, particularly, is that she could serve hot rolls straight from the oven to the table without getting them cold. In the efficiency kitchen, you have to walk around to the dining room, which is usually blocked off in some way by cabinets, to serve everything.
The next thing the experienced homemaker might do is sit down and maker her list of the essential activities of the day. I find it nice to make a list and then check off the items as they get done, as it gives the feeling of accomplishment. If you write your "to-do" list on some nicely decorated paper, and do it in your best handwriting, or even type it off the computer, it gives it a sense of importance, and you'll more likely look forward to doing it. The check mark boxes can be some favorite icon like roses, apples, hearts, or pies.
If you get the major work done in the morning, you'll find there are more hours in the day to do things you really like to do, that aren't "work" but still benefit the family, such as sewing.
It is a real treat to know someone who has a nice house and seems to be able to manage it, and will invite you over sometimes to observe. It gives you real inspiration as you see someone else doing the job right. We all need a standard to reach for, and sometimes there is a person who can supply this. I benefitted a lot in my teens from watching several people, and one time I visited a woman who was really enjoying her home, and I watched as she somehow effortlessly made her home into a beautiful type of kingdom, where you felt really royal. She never complained, but enthusiastically cleaned and moved things, and when she was in a room even to get something, if she noticed something out of place, she would put it right or clean it right then and there. These were small jobs, mind you, that only took a few seconds, but it kept her home sparklling. She had small children but they always appeared to be clean and her laundry was reasonably caught up. Watching her gave me so many ideas, and made me look forward to having my own home someday.

Friday, December 03, 2004

Homeschooling Experiences

My children are all grown, and during our homeschooling experience, there would be the usual amount of people telling my husband to tell me to put the children in school, but I am so glad we didn't do it. My children are all doing very well, and I don't regret homeschooling them at all. My husband said he'd be glad to talk to any men who are doubting about it. People couldn't see where we were headed, with home education, and so they were frightened for us. Now that its been completed, they can see the end results and feel more confidence in what we did.

Tuesday, May 20, 2003

Women's Sphere of Influence on Civilization (1837)


Trellis With Garden, by T.C. Chiu,  from Lovely Whatevers



The book that this article reviews is:


— De Education des Meres de Famille ou de la Civilisation du Genre Humain
par les Femmes: par L. Aime Martin.

 On the Education of Mothers, or The Civilization
of the Human Race by Women: by L. Aime Martin. 2 vols. Brussels. 1837.

(Note the similarities in the problems with people's ideas about women today!)

Three systems have severally claimed the rule in the education of woman, and each of
these has found many followers both in doctrine and practice.



I. The old-fashioned system, which is not without its advocates even in these days,
regarded women merely as destined to become housewives. They must accordingly be
taught to cook, and sew, and spin, take care of the sick, do the duties of the household,
and concern themselves with nothing more. If they could faithfully discharge these
duties, it was of little consequence, whether they could boast of much more ambitious
learning and accomplishment, or could claim any intimacy with the muses, or the
graces.


If a young lady knew how to mix a good pudding, or make a nice pie, it was no
matter how little she could tell of the compounding of gases, or the other mysteries of
chemistry. The busy hum of her spinning-wheel, accompanied by some simple song,
was deemed good music enough, and no mention was made of harp and piano. She
was taught to prize the early voice of the birds far more, than the midnight concert of
the elegant warblers of the, drawing- room.

 Even her most showy accomplishments leaned towards domestic utility. The boasted sampler, with its varied alphabets and fanciful mottoes, displayed a skill that was destined to be used not in any rich and ostentatious embroidery, but in marking and adorning the family stockings.


The highest achievement of the needle, — the mourning piece, — while it proved the skill of
the patient embroiderer, proved also her power of being useful, — showed that her
most elegant was one of her most serviceable arts; and that even when it sought to be
most ornamental, it was employed in the service of family love and domestic religion.



The day of quadrilles and waltzes had not come. Few women had the ambition to
learn foreign languages. Happy she, who could read and write English correctly,
without aspiring to French or Italian.



Such are some of the features of the old-fashioned system of education, as it flourished
in the days of our grandmothers. It had many excellencies, and some defects. Its sins,
however, were rather of omission, than commission. The excellent household training,
which was the pride of olden times, is worthy all praise.

The happy homes of Old and New England in former days speak its worth, while many a degenerate race now shames the memory of its ancestors. Yet this education was deficient in the higher culture. It did not enough to refine the tastes and the manners, — not enough to
expand, and enlighten, and invigorate the mind.


It is needless, however, to dwell upon the defects of the ancient system, for the present age is exposed to far other dangers.

There are, indeed, not a few sticklers for the old-fashioned ways ; not a few, who
stoutly condemn the modern mania for accomplishments; who would banish harp and
piano, and reinstate the spinning-wheel; honor the kitchen and dairy far before the
drawing-room; close their houses to the dancing-master, as to a pestilence, and think
money worse than thrown away, when given for instruction in French or Italian.


Some there are, who seem to think even a thorough English education needless to a woman,
believing it to be her sole business to be the drudge of her household, and servant of
her husband. A friend, who taught school in a distant town, once told us, that when he
urged upon a very bright scholar the importance of studying grammar, her zeal for the
study was rebuked by the father, who refused to provide the requisite book, and said,
that grammar was a mess of nonsense, — it was nothing, but " he loved and she
loved," and would not make his daughter a bit the better wife. Such cases are almost
solitary in our country.



II. The great tendency of late has been to a new system of education, just the reverse of
the old. This modern system despises utility, and favors only the graceful and
ornamental. It insists solely upon accomplishments. It finds no fault, if girls are
ignorant of household duties, and are as little skilled in preparing a cup of coffee, or
making a loaf of bread, as in finding the philosopher's stone, or concocting the elixir
of im mortality, so long as they can dance and sing and play on an instrument, and
prate a little French or Italian.

 This notion of education has wrought much evil in the
world, and nowhere more than in our own country. It has made the mothers and
daughters of a great many good middling families discontented with their lot,
negligent of their duties, and aping elegance, when they ought to be studying utility.


It has done much to destroy the genuine domestic virtues in all conditions of life. This
system may well be called the French. In France, it most prevails ; and it has extended
with the progress of French influence. It is making fearful inroads in all countries, and
giving to France an empire mightier, than was ever won by the armies of Napoleon.
The march of her hosts has been arrested ; but not the triumphs of her arts.


Russia struck the first deadly blow at Napoleon's empire; but Russia is gradually adopting
French tastes and manners ; and Moscow itself is paymg homage to a mightier power
in the fashions of Paris, than that, which her flaming palaces drove to a ruinous
retreat.

 Old England is hardly England any longer, and is fast giving up to French
influences that sceptre of independence, which was so nobly defended at Trafalgar and
Waterloo. The English writers on female education speak in most decided terms of the
evils of French influences, upon the homes and the women of the land. We find strong
condemnations of this prevailing tendency in writers otherwise so little alike, as Maria
Edgeworth and Hannah More.

 The best work that has lately appeared upon female
culture in our mother country, the work of Mrs. Ellis, on the " Women of England," is
a vindication of the good old domestic virtues and pursuits against the attacks of
foreign vanities and laxity.

No one can have given the least observation to the state of things in our own land,
without deploring the present tendencies of female education here. Perhaps the worst
is now over; and the better ideas, as presented by such women, as Miss Sedg- wick,
Mrs. Farrar, and Mrs. Sigourney, are henceforth to take the lead. But the present
generation hardly practises those ideas. Many a city mansion, and many a plain
farmer's home, has been lost to all true comfort and happiness, by the inroads of
Parisian and boarding-school ideas.

There is no fear that our young women will have
too much elegance or refinement. The fear is, they will have too little. There is about
as much vulgarity of soul and manner in what is called fashionable life, as in what is
called low life. Pretence is always vulgar, and arrogance always unladylike. "What a
catalogue of miseries," says Mrs. Ellis, " might be made out, as the consequences of
this mistaken ambition of women to be ladies !

 Gentlewomen they may be, and
refined women too ; for when did either gentleness or true refinement disqualify a
woman for her proper duties ? But that assumption of delicacy, which unfits them for
the real business of life, is more to be dreaded in its fatal influence upon their
happiness, than the most agonizing disease, with which they could be afflicted." How
selfish such women are, and how sensible of the least pain ! " Not the most exquisite
creation of poetic fancy was ever supposed to be more susceptible of pain, than is now
the highly educated young lady, who reclines on a couch in an apartment slightly
separated from that in which her father sells his goods, and but one remove from the
sphere of her mother's culinary toil."


The author of the work before us has stated better than any one else the evils of the
modern system of Education in his own country, while he is well aware of its
redeeming graces. He sketches the history of female culture in France, and eloquently
describes its present state.


According to him, Descartes prepared the way for the regeneration of women in
France, by his doctrine of the dignity of the individual mind, and the tendency of that
doctrine to lead each one to think for himself, and to respect the minds of others.
Rousseau was earnest to apply this thought to the condition of women, and to rebuke
their too common neglect of their offspring, and to insist upon the duty of each
mother being the nurse of her own child. But Rousseau's system was defective,
because it took the child from the mother after infancy, and entrusted its education to
a preceptor.


Fleury and Fenelon also are names, that deserve to be mentioned among those, who
have contributed to women's elevation. Fleury brought forward what then seemed a
great paradox, in maintaining, that girls ought to learn something besides the
catechism, sewing, singing, dancing, dressing, speaking civilly, and making a courtesy.
" And what," asks our author, " was this new instruction, which was so to scandalize
the Sevignes, the Coulanges, the La Fayettes ? It was the knowledge of reading,
writing, and accounts, sufficient acquaintance with business to procure good counsel,
and of medicine enough to take care of the sick." Yet the Abbe also insisted on moral
and religious education.

To the religious teachings of Fleury, Fenelon added his heavenly voice. The simple
doctrines of his beautiful work on the education of girls is inspired by the love of Jesus
Christ for little children. Although writing at an age, when the reign of woman was
omnipotent at court, Fenelon's ideas were in advance of the age, and were much
scandalized. Woman, although adored as an idol, was not respected as a living soul;
and he seemed to say strange words, who spoke of her solemn duties and immortal
destiny. Fenelon's principles are not very well recognized in this somewhat better day
of French principles.

Passing from Descartes, Rousseau, Fleury, and Fenelon, Aime Martin thus
characterizes the present condition of female education in France : —

" Since Fenelon and Rousseau, there has been progress among men, and the education
of women has gained by it. It is no longer a disputed question, whether it is good to
instruct them, and to what extent their instruction should go ; it is allowed that their
understanding should be developed ; the talents of artists and masters of languages
are given them ; they skim over the circle of the sciences; but in these studies, nothing
calls them to think their own thoughts ; the lessons of the school are merely stamped
on their brains; thus when the passions come on, those passions, to which it is not too
much to oppose both the habits of virtue and the principles of religion, they find
hands skilful upon the piano, a memory, that repeats, and a soul, that sleeps. Such is
the woman, saving some rare exceptions, whom our age affords, with her petty
devotions, her boarding- school morality, her mechanical talents, her love of pleasure,
ignorance of all matters of life, and the need of loving and being loved.

" Not that this education has not also its brilliant side ; it introduces into society the
tastes and manners of artists, much grace, much originality. The duchess and the
citizen's wife, if indeed there are any longer such distinctions, rival each other in the
saloons in the exercise of the highest talents; some make poems, which are sold in aid
of the Greeks and Poles ; others compose pictures, the price of which is devoted to
pious enterprises ; all write with grace and accuracy, and the pens of a Sevigne and a
La Fayette have almost become vulgar.

 Thus education is. gradually levelling society;
its uniformity is the mightiest democracy, and I do not think myself uttering a
parodox in saying, that the talents of women have done more for the equality of ranks,
than all the decrees of our national assembly.

" Enter one of our most fashionable saloons : see that crowd of men of all ages
standing together, and who seem clad in the same cloth: one is a banker, the other a
marquis, this one is a virtuoso, that a magistrate. Yet notwithstanding the uniformity
of their dark dress, there is in their language, in their air, a mark, which distinguishes
and classifies them. It is not so with the women : by the grace of their attitudes, by the
elegance of their manners, you would think them all of equal birth and of the same
rank ; there is the same information, the same charm, the same taste for the arts ; no
means of distinguishing the daughters of a notary from those of a courtier, a
capitalist, or a general. Behold that charming group at the piano ; it is executing
together a choice piece from Kossini, with as much accuracy as Italian actors ; there
are the wife of a physician, the wife of a peer of France, a marchioness, the daughter
of a man of business. Nothing separates them except difference of talent.

" Now turn your eyes to that lady, whose toilette, so simple and yet so elegant, has
fixed attention for a moment; it is one of our most beautiful duchesses. What an
amiable smile she exchanges with the young person, who has just seated herself next
her ! Two truly remarkable women ! the duchess teaches her sons Latin, and writes
romances ; the other writes poetry ; a poet and beautiful, she is the very Corinne of
her age ; her fame, that is her nobility ! Thus in this elegant assembly, where all is
confounded, birth, fortune, titles, condition, there is no distinction ; beauty attracts
attention, talent marks place, and education levels all.

" Surely if the life of women were to be confined to the studio and the ball ; if their
object were merely to dazzle and please, the great problem would be resolved by this
education of the soiree ; but the hours of pleasure are short, and the slow hours of
reflection succeed them. The internal life, the moral life, the duties of the mother, and
the duties of the wife, all this comes, and all this has been forgotten. Then they return
to the void in the bosom of their family, with romantic passions, imagination
uncontrolled, and ennui, that great destroyer of female virtue.

 The sad consequences
of this state of things, lamentations on account of it strike our ears; it is the cry of all
mothers, the complaint of all husbands ; and in those grievous straits, where each is
agitated and desperate, the worst is that indifference is usually the result.

" To get a just idea of the improvidence of our systems of Education, what is needed ?
To demand their aim. Is it religion ? But religion — misunderstood indeed —
condemns all that is taught. Is it domestic happiness ? But these talents so laboriously
acquired, these talents, which remove the necessity of thinking do not appear in
household habits. Is it the prosperity, the glory of the country ? Mockery ! what
mother thinks of that in these days ? Thus just as we seek the aim, the whole vanishes.
Nothing for individual happiness, nothing for general prosperity ! The world remains,
and it is to this, in fact, that all efforts tend. The care is to please it, rather than to
resist it; the wish is to shine, to reign ; vanity, that is the end, to which tender mothers
do not cease to point their daughters, and upon which the world, which pushes them
on, sees them wrecked with indifference.

Vanity in dress!
Vanity in fascinating talents!
Vanity in information!

" Be beautiful, be polite, you will be noticed ; be gentle, be submissive, you will be
heard, says a mother to her daughter ; which really means, always substitute the show
for the reality. The soul, like the body, has its light embellishments; it is used to them
from the cradle ; evil is not cured, it is only hid ; the character is not changed, it is
disguised. Thus vanity covers all; to seem and not to be, constitutes the sum and
substance of Education." — Book I. chap. 8.

The lessons given in religion are mere words, which are contradicted by education and
example. The contempt of the world, taught by religion, is not very consistently
accompanied by constant instruction in the arts of fascination: —

" It seems as if the religious life and the worldly life were two champions in a mortal
combat; whichever conquers, the man who embraces it is only a mutilated being,
incomplete, the deplorable remains of passions or superstitions.

" The complete man is he, who lives at the same time a social and religious life ; with a
powerful hand he ends the combat between the two adversaries, and marking out to
each its place, he treads with a firm step the ways of God and according to the lights
of reason.

" But in order that these lights, now so rare, may be shed abroad in the world, they
must shine in our Educations ; they cannot reach the multitude, unless mingled with
the first emotions of life, and under the irresistible influence of the mother of the
family; this is the sacred lamp, which the industrious wife of Virgil lighted by night,
for her toil, by the cradle of her child.

" In the Paradise Lost, there is a lion whose creation is not yet finished ; he is seen
coming forth half formed from the earth, which is producing him; his eye shines, his
hair is agitated, but his body is only an inert mass, without motion, yet fixed to the
soil; impatient, he waits the last spark to burst into life.

" Sublime image of mankind! There is no life but in the shead, the rest has no motion ;
let light penetrate to it! Snatch it from nothingness, and let it take possession of
empire ! " — Book I. chap. 8.

Such is the picture of fashionable education in France. It will apply in some measure
to America. In many cases, the American picture is less pleasing. In many cases, the
adoption of French ideas by American women spoils their true American character,
and gives them little of the much sought elegance, except an apish affectation. True
domestc worth is often lost, and the fascinations of fashionable society, which, if
gained, would be but a poor compensation for the loss, are not attained.

 Many with
whom the " morning is all rehearsal and the evening is all performance," who give to
waltzing and music the time, which they owe to solid learning or domestic duties, not
only sacrifice utility to show, know little of household economy and useful learning,
but after all make indifferent musicians and very sorry waltzers. They are neither
French, nor American, but a bad mixture of both.

HI. This tendency towards a merely showy education has been observed by many
judicious minds, and has doubtless been the most cogent of the reasons, why so strong
a movement has recently been made towards the opposite extreme, of which we will
now briefly speak, as the third idea of female education.

 Disgusted with the frivolity of
too many of the sex, indignant at the insult of rearing immortal beings, as if they were
to be only the gilded butterflies of a summer hour, many sturdy spirits have
maintained, that women should have an education as solid and severe as that of men.


Hence the masculine school of female education. This system has found its principal
advocates in England and America. The females in France, who have most ably
vindicated their sex from the charge of weakness of intellect, have never advocated the
masculine doctrine. A Madame de Stae'l, though unsurpassed by any of her sex for
vigor of intellect, ever prides herself in a woman's heart, and spite of her defiance of
Napoleon shows no leaning towards the doctrine of a Wolstoncraft, a Martineau, or a
Grimke.

Mary Wolstoncraft was the first conspicuous advocate of this system, although there
have always been sturdy champions of woman's equality. We read in Bayle's
Dictionary of a Lu- cretia Marinella, a Venetian lady, and Jacquette Guillaume, a
French woman, who, about two centuries since, wrote books asserting even the
superiority of women over men in every respect. Notwithstanding Mary Wolstoncraft's
many sins, much wrong is generally done to her memory in deeming her an utter
infidel. Her book on the Rights of Woman is based on the moral worth of the soul and
its immortality.

Now we can have no quarrel with any doctrine, whether brought forward by Mrs.
Godwin, or less objectionably by Miss Martineau and Miss Grimke, which maintains
the claims of the sex to a moral and intellectual nature, and their right to as sound an
education as man enjoys. But when in union with this doctrine, it is maintained that
women should be educated as politicians and orators, and should divide with man the
rougher labors of life, we must dissent, not because of their inferiority, but their
equality ; not because we would close on woman the path of honor, but because her
honor is most promoted by excellence in her own sphere, as a wife, a mother, the
guardian of the young, mistress of the home, arbiter of society.

IV. We have now spoken of the three leading systems of female Education, the old
fashioned or domestic, the modern or showy, the masculine. Which of these shall we
choose, as best ? Neither, by itself, but a union of all. Woman should be skilled in the
duties of the household, and yet not be so brought up, as to place the end of her
existence in cooking and sewing ; she should be accomplished, and yet not so showy,
as to be always aiming at effect, and sacrificing substance to seeming; she should be
educated intellectually and morally with the utmost thoroughness, and at the same
time should never be allowed to forget that her sphere is not that of man.

 Thus we
would advocate a fourth or Eclectic system, that should avoid the defects and
comprise the excellencies of the three. This Eclectic system has many distinguished
champions, and has the spirit of the age upon its side. It is maintained virtually,
although not in precise terms, in the remarkable work under review.

The aim of the work is to show the vast influence, which woman may exert in the
civilization of the human race ; woman, not as an orator or politician, but as a
religious mother. The first part treats of the influence of the sex and the need of better
education ; the second part gives an eloquent outline of the philosophical, moral, and
religious studies and opinions, appropriate to women's sphere.

Napoleon said one day to Madame Campan ; "the old systems of Education are good
for nothing ; what is wanting to the proper Education of young persons in France ? " "
Mothers" replied Madame Campan. This expression struck the Emperor, and led him
to exclaim: " Ah ! that makes the whole system of Education ; we need mothers who
know how to bring up their children."


" This profound remark," says the author, " constitutes the subject of our book.
Expecting nothing more from the present generation, hoping nothing more from our
systems of public Education, we say in our turn, we need mothers, who know how to
educate their children ! "

Our readers must bear in mind the difference between French and American society,
while estimating the wisdom of the work before us. It must be remembered,
especially, that what is said of marriage, as freeing the young girl from the slavish
restraints of a boarding school or convent, and giving her a boundless and dangerous
liberty, has little application to American life.

 With us, unmarried women are just as
free to mingle in society, as the married. Consequently our women carry with them to
married life far more practical wisdom, than the French, and are free from many of
their dangers.

After speaking of the progress of ideas on the subject of female education, and of the
prevalent faults regarding it, Aime Martin thus states the plan of his work.
" I have shown the vices of our fashionable modes of Education, and thus far I have
proposed no general reformation. Education of the convent, education of the
boarding-school, education in the family, the old method, the new method, no matter
which, I take them all; but this first education ended, I take the pupil to myself and
mine begins!

" The young woman has left the home of her parents ; she is a wife, a mother ; her
anxiety allows her no longer repose. See her perusing and reperusing Fenelon,
Rousseau, Madame de Beaumont, Madame Guizot, Madame de Remuzat, and seeking
everywhere new rules and methods; a secret instinct tells her, that to become worthy
of the education of her child, she must recommence her own.

" The first thought to be given her is the importance of concerning herself less with
what she should teach her child, and more with what she should inspire him. Other
persons may make him learned, she alone can render him virtuous ; good mother! lay
hold of the young heart, and thus you will one day guide the mind.

" This is the chief point, or rather the sum and substance of the education of mothers.
The aim is, in effect, to release women from the narrow circle, in which society
restricts them, and to extend their thoughts to all the objects, which can render them
better or happier.

" A religious, philosophical, and moral world is to be opened to them. It is their
mission to introduce our infancy to it, as into a holy temple, where the soul studies
and learns itself in the presence of its God.

" Let us pause a moment upon so grave a subject.

" The thought of man is not confined, like that of the animals, within the limits of this
globe. It quits the visible for the invisible, and freeing itself from matter is lost in
contemplations of the infinite. There all our grandeur lies, since there alone, we find
the principle of our being, the bases of our morality, the last why, the last how, of our
fugitive existence. Truth bursts from the immaterial world ; it is the torch of the other
life, which sheds its light upon this.

" Thus is it, that our soul is drawn towards this unknown world by the very necessities
of our earthly existence. God places here the sources of truth and virtue with the
revelation of a better life!

" The study of these great phenomena constitutes what Socrates would have called the
important science. It is the subject of this book :

" The science of ourselves, which leads to the knowledge of God.

" The science of the moral laws of nature, which leads to the
knowledge of truth.

* * * * * * *
" What a destiny is that of women ! equally a prey to all the seductions of pleasure, to
all the pangs of grief, as mistress, as wife, as mother, without other weapons, than
their weakness ; who does not understand how important it is to give them an
education broad and profound, which shall provide them with the resource of a virtue
mightier than the griefs which await, and the seductions which threaten them ? "

Once religion instructed them from the pulpit, but confining all its morality to
penitence, it gave rise to repentance more than to virtue. A Massillon, a Bourdaloue, a
Bossuet strove to smother their passions; they should have known how to guide them.
Far from supporting humanity, they broke it down beneath the yoke of a violent
doctrine, which they illustrated by the fires of hell. And lo ! their greatest miracles
were not to make us live virtuously in the world, but to tear us from it; at their
command, Lavalliere robed herself in penitential sackcloth ; Chevreuse and
Longueville fled to the desert to bewail their sins, and queens built temples, founded
cloisters, and humbled themselves beneath their vaults!

" Surely the great moral truths repeated constantly at the altar, in presence of God,
have not been without fruits for humanity ; and if freed from all the superstitions
which belittle them, and from cruel dogmas as to the eternity of punishment, and the
vengeance of a pitiless Divinity, women might draw hence strong and efficient
instruction; but it is solitude now in the temple, the priests there keep a lonely watch,
listening from afar to the world, which cares no more for the ideas of a bygone age.
Once the people followed them, because they took the lead; now the people await
them, because they remain behind. Thus moral instruction escapes them; sad reaction
of our excesses ; theological impieties have brought religion to neglect; and the neglect
of religion abandons us passive to all the vanities of human intelligence.

" Now what is left for woman ? Some offices of devotion, and the mass on Sunday : no
moral and religious direction, for I cannot dignify with this name that brief and
narrow instruction, entrusted to the memory in childhood, and which unsupported by
the conviction of the parents, and the example of the family, holds almost the place of
a dream, in the dream of life. Nevertheless, religious sensibility exists ; and this, with
maternal love, is enough to revive the whole soul.

 These two sentiments,
inextinguishable in women, are now the last hope of civilization, and since all our
modes of education tend to weaken them, be it our aim, as far as may be, to fortify
them and renew their power.

" This power is entirely moral; we shall seek it immediately in the profound study of
our material and spiritual faculties; it will be necessary to trace the line which divides
them ; what belong to the earth! what to heaven ! an important distinction, too much
neglected even in our day, and ignorance of which plunges us into darkness. Before
drawing this line, you are oppressed by the vain phantoms of materialism; doubt
overwhelms you ; but the separation once made, the phantoms vanish, darkness is
dispelled, and the consoling truth appears !

" You will observe how this simple distinction suffices to establish the existence of
God, and the immortality of the soul, not as dogmas, but as facts, at the same time
independent of the illusions of thought, and the formulas of logic. There is a pleasure
in seeing truths so sublime come out from the invisible world, all luminous and
undeniable, as the unknown quantity of a mathematical problem.

" These truths come to light, it is true, through material sensations, but without
springing from them.

" There we find an entirely new knowledge of being, and consequently new elements of
education. The child is presented to its mother, as a spiritual creature; the object is
not merely to teach an understanding, but to develop a soul ; and this soul, the mother
knows; she knows where to carry light, where to address her lessons. Others may
provide the vessel its sails and rigging ; she alone communes with the pilot, seats him
at the helm, provides him with a compass, and before launching him upon the ocean
of the world, points to him in heaven his guiding-star.

" From the study of man, we shall pass to the search for truth. Truth is the opposite of
error; and error is the barbarism and crime, that ravage the world.

" Truth is not the property of any man, or caste, or people, or religion. Its character is
beauty, utility, universality. Our passions and superstitions are the darkness which
encompass it; the laws of Nature are its light.

" Our aim is to examine the moral, philosophical, political, religious questions, which
concern man, and to refer them to the truth, by submitting them to an immutable
authority.

" Thus we gradually arrive to the most important part of this book ; the moral studies
of the gospel; we say the most important, for all education, which is not religious,
makes man incomplete, and at most, only forms an intelligent animal. It is an error to
suppose, that man becomes truly great by science ; he is not great, he is not man, but
by the knowledge of God. Bereft of that, we see only his limited existence, and have a
philosophy without light.

" Why such general selfishness ? Why the love of gold, the love of power, the love of
vengeance, instead of the love of humanity ? Why so much ambition, which brings
forth so much crime ? Why so many murders, adulteries, ingratitudes, calumnies,
iniquities, depravities ? two causes: error and misery. A single remedy : religion.

" You may in vain agitate yourself, torment yourself, in vain vex your brain ; to
provide this divine power, you will interrogate to no purpose all the scenes, of which
you are so proud, and the ciphers of algebra, and the lines of geometry; these vast
displays of learning will give you nothing but the materials for a learned scholar. To
make a man, the soul must be developed, and soon as the soul appears, it seeks its
God. Thus we ever return to that thing so despised, — religion.

" Such is briefly the plan of these studies. We address it to mothers, not that they may
commit its principles to the memory of their children, but that they may impress
them generously and deeply on the soul : their mission is not instruction, but
influence ; it is not knowledge which is demanded of them, but inspiration and
guidance. In the bosom of the family, the child receives a certain number of ideas,
which belong to his age, his nation, and to the rank which he occupies in it.

 These
ideas are more or less exalted, more or less true; there are some which express
political or sectarian passions ; others, that are only prejudices or superstitions. No
matter! he soon becomes all that he hears, all that he sees, royalist or Jacobin, fanatic
or atheist, as of old the people became partisans for Orleans or Burgundy, Navarre or
the League. The impressions of infancy give a passion for a party, for an interest,
never for truth !

" Do you not feel that this is the source of all our errors ?

" It is, then, to the family, that education should be carried. There truth should be
exhibited to us, like duty at Sparta, country at Rome. Truth, the main-spring of
modern nations, has promise of the whole world : and if the love of country has sent
forth nations of heroes, this love so much broader and more sublime, will produce the
civilization of mankind."—Book I. chap. 12.

After devoting several chapters to the subjects of physical education, and public
instruction, and distinctly asserting the moral education of the young to be the
province of woman, Aitne Martin enters upon the philosophical part of his work. His
philosophy does not seem to be borrowed from any one master, but is generous and
eclectic. It is lofty, yet humble. He most warmly asserts the spiritual nature of man,
and the immortality of the soul, and its capacity for attaining religious truth ; yet he
shrinks modestly from the task of accurately defining the faculties of the mind. "

 All
definition of faculties which are related to the infinite," he says, " is. impossible.
Neither sentiment, nor reason, nor the beautiful, nor God, nor any faculty of the soul,
has ever been defined precisely, because their essence is infinite. And nevertheless,
that which we cannot define, we feel, we think, we believe; we have consciousness of it
without argument; and this consciousness is the mysterious star, which rises upon the
limit of two worlds ! "

vOL. xxvIII. — 3D S. vOL. x. NO. I. 8
The second book being upon psychology, the third book endeavors to guide the
mother in the search for truth, on moral and political subjects. Here we find
interesting essays on a variety of subjects, — logic and love,— the laws of nature and of
nations, — the republics of Athens and Rome, and the ideal republic of Plato, — life
and death, — the perfectibility of the human race, and its hopes of progress.

 His ideas
of government are strongly republican, and at the same time, deeply religious.
" God be thanked," he says, " the ideas of some people elected, and others damned, are
dead in Europe. Authority. does not constitute religion, nor the king's good pleasure
constitute government. The universal reason is now awake. The vulgar saying, that the
voice of the people is the voice of God, has been comprehended by sages.

They have
felt, that to diffuse truth, there was less need of imploring kings, than of educating the
people. Truth descends with difficulty from kings to to the people ; but its triumph is
certain, when it rises from the people to kings.

 Consider how many changes two or
three gospel principles, falling at hazard in the crowd, have produced. The French
charter, the abolition of the slave-trade, the emancipation of Ireland, the liberty of
America, the deliverance of Greece were in the minds of the people, before entering
the reason of princes.

 If monarchs had listened to the people, Italy would be free, and
Poland in being: two crimes less would have pressed on the heads of the sovereigns of
Europe. It is to the public conscience, enlightened by the laws of Nature, that the
appeal must be made. Upon this the prosperity of the human race reposes ; and the
rising age shall behold the civilization of India and Africa, the deliverance of the East,
the abolition of castes, the marriage of priests, the emancipation of the people, and
the freedom of the world ! " — Book III. chap. 30.

The fourth and last book treats of the moral studies of the Gospel, and unfolds religion
to the mother of the family. It is pervaded by good sense, beauty, and piety. Here and
there, as throughout the whole work, we meet with expressions, that might as well
have been spared, and the extravagance of the Frenchman gets the better of the
gravity of the moralist. But on the whole, it would be difficult to find a more beautiful
treatise on religion, as appealing to women, than that here given.

The opinions
advanced are very decided, yet entirely free from dogmatism. We should call Aime
Martin a Unitarian, as doubtless he is, were we not unwilling to deal needlessly with
sectarian terms. We will let him designate his own creed. All that he says upon
religion shows him to be a Christian, after the pattern of Fenelon, whom he never
ceases to honor as the restorer of genuine Christianity in France.

A great part of the book upon religion is applicable to the state of things in our own
land. All that is said of the power of women to destroy bigotry and fanaticism, and
soften the somewhat harsh features of the prevailing faith, is worthy of being echoed
from one end of our country to the other.

 It is very strange, and no less strange than
true, that very little is done by the gentler sex to make the doctrines of the gospel
appear in their native mildness and love. The most denunciatory style of preaching is
too apt to charm the ears, which are generally thought to prefer more winning tones.
Countless exampless of meek and amiable piety are found in our American homes,
and many a mother and daughter has won souls to Christ, by a life of purity and faith,
which is more convincing than whole libraries of polemic theology.

Still the influence
of the sex leans towards the harsher schools of Divinity. To them we look for the
regeneration of religion, and deliverance from the chains of theologians. Such
sentiments as the following will find a response in many hearts: —

" We will boldly oppose the laws of Nature to the fictions of theology. What guide
more sublime in separating the work of God from the work of men ! What means
more potent to lead us from indifference to love ! If all our evils spring from theology,
all our blessings come from religion : the double light of Nature and the Gospel cannot
penetrate our hearts without bearing thither the convictions of virtue.

" The general spirit of the Gospel is love of humanity, compassion for weakness,
pardon to penitence ; it is yet more ; it is benevolence and beneficence towards our
enemies. I hear Jesus on the cross pray for his murderers ! I hear him upon the Mount
say to his disciples : ' It is written, you shall love your neighbor, and hate your enemy ;
but I say unto you, do good to them that hate you ; pray for them which persecute you,
and speak evil of you, that ye may be the children of your Father in the heavens, who
makes the sun to rise upon the good and the evil, and the rain to fall upon the just and
the unjust.'

" Listen! there is the great law of Nature : The sun rises upon the good and evil: and
the morality of Christ is but,an expression of this law. You should imitate God, you
should lay hold of his purpose in his eternal blessings, and manifest its divine
influence around you.

" Everywhere the same gentleness and morality ; everywhere the disciples of Christ are
called not to fight but to teach. Their arms are persuasion, their conquest, the heart.
In his last interviews with his apostles, when unbosoming his soul, Jesus unfolds the
means of diffusing the truth ; he exhorts them to devote themselves as so many
sacrifices for the salvation of men ; for they are sent as lambs in the midst of wolves.
They should pardon, they should bless, they should instruct; the master has come not
to condemn the world, but to save it." Book IV. chap. 5.

The following remarks on the priesthood are, we trust, becoming every day less
applicable to the clergy of our land:—-

" It is an established fact, that light has come to us by the Gospel in spite of the
priesthood, which has built in darkness. Not because the Christian community has
lacked teachers, schools, or libraries. Their writings were many, but barren ; the
human mind worked over incessantly the same old notions. When we plunge into this
study, we are struck with its inanity.

 No broad and generous ideas, not one of those
evangelical sentiments, which embrace the whole race, no knowledge of the love of
God and our neighbor. From Saint Jerome to Bourda- loue, from Saint Augustine to
Bossuet, always the same terrible Deity, the God of vengeance, excommunication,
damnation, hell. The saints read the Gospel without getting much good from it; either
for themselves or for others.

They alone had possession of the book, which was to
civilize the people, and they made use of it to establish and regulate monasteries. We
had the austerities of India, instead of the morality of Christ. The invention of
printing was needed, a second revelation, to wrest from them this book, and give it to
the universe. We make bold to say, that without the genius of Faust and Gutenberg,
the doctrine of Jesus Christ had been lost to humanity. The Gospel did not truly exist
till this epoch, and the knowledge of its morality dates only from the age of Fenelon."
— Book IV. chap. 11.

We are tempted to quote the two short chapters on Faith and Hope, and Pogmas and
Morals; but enough has been said to indicate their spirit. We should like the whole
treatise on religion better, if more account were made of the doctrines of the Gospel,
and such exclusive stress were nnt laid upon its morality.

 These doctrines never
appear in their full heauty and power, except in connexion with the morality of the
Gospel. We cannot but feel, that the author has not gone quite deeply enough into the
science of religion, although his heart is right. We should like to have him add a
chaji'.er on the cardinal doctrines of Atonement and Justification by Faith. Viewed
according to his principles, these doctrines would have a charm and freshness, quite
strange to our many formal systems of dogmatics.

Aime Martin closes his work by a recapitulation of its principles, and an appeal to the
sex to whom it is addressed. He eloquently enjoins it upon women to watch over the
moral and religious sensibilities of the young, as their peculiar care; and to impress
upon them from the cradle the central truth of the unity and parental character of
God, and the great sentiment of the love of God and man. We can pardon and even
admire a little Gallic enthusiasm in the close of so eloquent a treatise: —

" The book of Nature and the Gospel unite in this truth, so simple and yet so vast:
« Unity of God."
" And in this sentiment so sublime, and so natural:
" Love of God and men."
« Unity of God,"
" That is to say an only God, Father of all men ; consequently, all are brothers upon the
globe.
" Equality of rights, liberty of all, abolition of exclusive privileges, of casies, of slavery,
of war, of capital punishment, result from the brotherhood of mankind."
" Love of God and men."

" Here religion takes a moral character, in uniting God and man, as father to child ;
and morality takes a religious character, in uniting man to God, as child to Father.

" Accordingly as the soul is penetrated by these divine sentiments, national
animosities are extinguished, prejudices vanish, the great people is formed, and the
reign of God on earth advances from west to east.

" The reign of God is the happiness of man by virtue.

" The world will arrive at this by the study of the laws of nature, and by their
comparison with human laws. Pious studies, which will ensure to our children the
constant presence of God ; sublime guidance, which will conduct them to the
discovery of all moral and physical truths, since truth is only the testimony, which
nature renders of its author!

" And to accomplish this prodigious revolution, to change the destinies of the world,
to reunite families, to reconcile nations, what is wanting ? A whole generation must
come to us acquainted with these truths ; a great people must receive them from the
cradle.

" Women ! if you could only catch a glimpse of the marvels promised to maternal
influence, with what noble pride, you would enter the career, which nature has opened
to you for so many ages! What is not in the power of any monarch or any nation, your
will can execute.

 You alone have the disposal of the rising generation, and you alone
can unite the scattered members, and impress upon them the same movement. What
I can put merely upon cold paper, you can engrave on the heart of a whole people. I
present you with a feeble image of the truth, you can give the truth itself to the world.
When in our promenades, and in our public gardens, I see that noisy crowd of little
children gathering from every side, and abandoned to the plays of childhood, my heart
leaps for joy, that they are still yours.

 Let each of you strive for the happiness of your
child ; in the happiness of the individual God has placed the promise of general
happiness. Young girls, young wives, tender mothers, it is in your souls, rather than in
the laws of the legislator, that the hopes of Europe and the destinies of mankind
repose ! "

The mothers of America will know how to pardon the enthusiasm of this appeal to the
mothers of France.

We close this article, which has already become longer than we intended, with a single
remark. We should rejoice, if the French eloquence of this book had been tempered
with a little Yankee practical wisdom. Were some dozen chapters omitted in the
second and third books, and a like number substituted from that precious and
unpretending little volume of Miss Sedg- wick's, Means and Ends, little would be
wanting to the perfection of the treatise. The two read together will make a guide to
the right system.

 May we not hope, that the whole truth will be heard, and practised,
and a new and generously eclectic system of female education shall prevail; that our
fair rising generation may be so trained, as to be domestic without being drudges,
refined and accomplished without being frivolous fash- ionists, intellectual without
being masculine, religious without bigotry or superstition. The signs of the times
encourage such a hope.